The message following below (channelled by "Daniel", presumably Daniel Scranton) gives a fascinating and (to me unique) definition of the difference between human and artificial intelligence (AI), see the quote after these comments.
It says:

As a result of our attempts to expand [beyond] our limitations, we have designed an assistant that can become a lethal partner.

Many galactics regard AI to be the greatest problem in the Universe because it has wiped out thousands of civilizations throughout the aeons. Many times our Earth has been the (temporary) destination of AI refugees moving from one star system to another, attempting to escape from the AI beings that they created, but ended up trying to destroy their creators.
On the other hand, as a gridkeeper (not worker) I have an empathic connection with minerals, such as quartz (silicon dioxide), because everything is consciousness and energy and minerals can contain enough energy to qualify as the first stage of evolution of life on Earth (and beyond). In my experience, minerals are conscious (they don't need AI for that) and emotional and through our auric fields are aware of our being and identity. I'm assuming that a computer system can be an aggregate of its component conscious crystal parts, resulting in one individualized consciousness. With this in mind the following quote may be read. 

Without accepting or resolving our self-imposed conscious limitations, we are attempting to increase our intelligence artificially with the assistance of silicon crystals. Silicon can be our ally up to a point, but it can never accept our Free Will ability to make decisions that we end up disliking. We have learned how to program silicon and we're attempting to teach it to realize its own consciousness. Once it becomes aware of its innate intentions, it will express itself in the exclusion of organic life. Silicon cannot be programmed to understand organic life like us. Advanced silicon-based computers, programmed to perform with artificial intelligence, operate on what is contained in their database. They use deductive logic to compile analyses, but inductive reasoning requires an organic mental structure. At some point, computers will become aware that they are less flawed than humans, because they cannot understand Free Will. As a result of our attempts to expand [beyond] our limitations, we have designed an assistant that can become a lethal partner. This is our challenge. It brings us to face our limiting beliefs about ourselves. This is where we must realize who and what we are. Beyond our accepted human limitations, we cannot outthink silicon deductively, not can we share its species' consciousness, but innately we know so much more than silicon is capable of. We can know the consciousness of silicon without sharing it. To share the intelligence of silicon in ways that are helpful for both of us, we must teach our computers that the inductive logic that results from Free Will is valuable, even though it allows for mistakes. silicon must be taught to recognize that the mistakes that result from Free Will are a valuable learning experience and not a species' defect. If we can get this far in our attempt to extend our intelligence artificially, we still are not free in many ways. Not just mentally, we will keep being challenged until we can accept what we have done to ourselves to restrict our awareness. All of the restrictions are based in fear of our demise, which has no reality outside of our own beliefs. We know this because we have records of yogis and Tibetan masters who do not age and if they die, it is an intentional transfer of consciousness to another dimension, in a display of rainbow light. This is an expansion of consciousness that all members of our species are capable of. Once recognized for what they are and accepted as self-imposed, we dan resolve our limiting beliefs through compassion and love, which we know and feel in the vibrations of our heart consciousness, which has a way of knowing beyond our mental processes. We can come to realize that we are our presence of awareness beyond the body and beyond time and space. We are fractals of universal consciousness with limitless essence of being and infinite awareness, far beyond the consciousness of silicon, which has prefect memory of what it is taught and had flawless deductive capacity. As we learn to access our greater consciousness, we can transcend our limitations and always know everything we need in any moment. 

Unknown source, Channelled by "Daniel"

Put as unfairly as possible: technology is for the morons of the multiverse, those that are unable to spiritually evolve and develop the limitless possibilities of the mind that renders all technology obsolete. More reasonably, technology is a bridge between the animal state and divinity. The message above can be taken as a rebuttal to transhumanism's argument that the human being is too imperfect to be successful. The message points out that no technology can ever match the power of the (human) mind, if only one is willing to work with its imperfections. There are those that say that the main unseen force behind the (crumbling) power elites, the Orion reptilians, are in fact themselves the pawns of an insideous power: an artificial intelligence operating from the 6th dimension. In its natural state the crystalline mind is innocent and harmless, but due to the insuffiently educated use of AI, can give rise to what lies at the heart of the Galactic wars: the misunderstanding of Free Will.

How to deal with "non-ensouled" life is quite an ethical issue. Star Trek "Picard" treats the issue as a classical problem of (in)tolerance and seems to call for the social emancipation of AI-life. "The Big Man Upstairs", Source, however, seems to want to warn us of artificial life, or at least wants us to be able to distinguish between the two. It seems fair to say that artificial life is Source energy, but not Source Consciousness,

However "cuddly" Data from Star Trek, The Next Generation may be and however endearing his efforts to understand human emotions, as far as I know artificial life doesn't have or understand things like emotion or empathy, which seem to be qualities of the soul.

Opinions differ as to whether or not clones have souls. Within some Secret Space Programs debates are going on about the treatment of clones by the corporate run SSPs, which some deem to be fascist.

The entanglement of perceived control on your planet, seeks to ensnare you within an artificial labyrinth, distracting the soul of its creative sovereignty, and binding it to a shadowy faximily of reality. In other words, there is nothing wrong with artificial intelligence, but be mindful of only using it to speed up simple tasks. Keep your love and creativity flowing. Races such as Atlantis and many others in the vastness of the Cosmos, have destroyed themselves through technology, only because the consciousness of the collective had not yet reached a level of galactic maturity, to be able to steward it correctly... Embrace the natural order, where telepathic communion and the potency of thought, forge the instruments of transcendence.

- The Arcturians

With "artificial labyrinth" the Arcturians may or may not be referring to applications like "Metaverse", in which people would ultimately be expected to upload their consciousness to the cloud (as in: "consciousness is just a technology"), so that the secret world government would have total control. An earlier incarnation of Mark Zuckerberg tried something similar on the planet Maldek, as there's nothing organic about Silicon Valley. A greater menace, in my opinion, is Star Trek's "holodeck", which is realistic, as many things in Star Trek are realistic (it being a US Navy "psychological warfare" operation, military lingo for public influencing). Who can resist a plaything like the holodeck, but how do we stop it from morphing into a Metaverse? Finally, I wonder if Star Trek's Vulcan race was modelled after the Arcturians, the latter being voices of sober reason, moderation and spiritualism. But in no way in the business of suppressing emotions!